LAW FIRM DIRECTORY

Dispute Resolution

50 Biggest Public Disputes

No Dispute Value, USD Legal counsels
1 International investment arbitration under the claim of Tatneft (Russian Federation) against Ukraine (under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules) on violation of the bilateral agreement on protection of investments between Ukraine and Russia Over 2,4 billion King & Spalding, Grischenko & Partners represented the State of Ukraine, Cleary Gottlieb Steen Hamilton LLP, CMS Cameron McKenna LLC, B.C. Toms and Co., Vasko & Nazarchuk represented Tatneft
2 Recognition of the judgment of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales in the case of recovery in favor of JSC BTA Bank (Kazakhstan) in Ukraine 451 million Ilyashev & Partners representedJSC BTA Bank (Kazakhstan)
3 Restructuring of the debt to PJSC CB Nadra coupled with the proceedings on bankruptcy and foreclosure 400 million Ilyashev & Partners representedPJSC CB Nadra
4 The litigation initiated by PJSC VTB Bank in respect of Industrial Energy Systems LLC on recovery of debts under credit agreements 245,8 million Integrites acted for PJSC VTB Bank
5 Recovery of the mortgaged property to settle debts of PJSC ISA Prime Developments in favor of PJSC Ukrsotsbank 190 million Alekseev, Boyarchukov & Partners represented PJSC Ukrsotsbank
6 Recovery of the troubled debts in favor of PJSC CB Nadra 182 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC CB Nadra
7 Bankruptcy of PJSC Vesta-Dnepr 176 million Integrites represented PJSC VTB Bank
8 Bankruptcy of PJSC Sumykhimprom 165 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC Sumykhimprom
9 A dispute on the failure of PJSC Ukrnafta to pay dividends to Naftogaz Ukraine 150 million Lexwell & Partners represented NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine
10 A dispute under the claim of PJSC CB Nadra against the State Mortgage Institution with respect to recovery of the debt from PJSC CB Nadra 141,5 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC CB Nadra
11 A dispute initiated by PJSC VTB Bank in respect of Tekhkomplekt LC on recovery of debts under credit agreements 135,2 million Integrites represented PJSC VTB Bank
12 A bankruptcy case of the Mykolaiv Shipyard Ocean on recognition of creditors' claims of the Dutch company Okean B.V. (judgment of the Odessa Commercial Court of Appeal of 20 August 2014) 133 million FCLEX represented Okean B.V.
13 Recovery of debts from a group of companies financing construction of the shopping mall ‘Gulliver Mall’ in favor of the Bank Finance and Credit 130 million FCLEX represented Bank Finance and Credit
14 Recovery of debts from the group Freedom Farm in favor of PJSC CB Nadra 113 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC CB Nadra
15 An arbitration case pertaining to the recovery of assets of Ukrainian sureties in favor of PJSC BTA Bank 100 million Ilyashev & Partners representedJSC BTA Bank
16 A case under the claim by the prosecutor’s office of the Odessa oblast concerning legality of PJSC ISRZ in the privatization of SE ISRZ 100 million Jurline representedPJSC ISRZ
17 A corporate dispute between JSC Poltava GOK and a group of non-resident companies on recognition of ownership of the shares of Poltava GOK 95 million FCLEX represented PJSC Poltava GOK
18 A dispute under the claim of UkrSibbank against the corporation AIS on debt recovery 88 million FCLEX, LCF Law Group represented natural persons – guarantors
19 Recognition and enforcement of a judgment of the High Court of Northern Ireland on invalidation of agreements of the investment company A1 with the Anglo Irish Bank 83 million Ilyashev & Partners represented investment company A1
20 Recovery of the credit debt in favor of PJSC Ukrsotsbank (Unicredit Group) from the agricultural company Mriya 80 million Alekseev, Boyarchukov & Partners representedPJSC Ukrsotsbank
21 A dispute between the Dutch company Okean B.V. and Wadan Yards on recovery of 98.737% share of the Mykolaiv shipyard Ocean and recognition of rights to the loan agreement in the amount of USD 5 million and EUR 53 million (September 2014) 79 million FCLEX represented Okean B. V
22 Bankruptcy of CJSC Kakhovka Prom-Agro 78 million Ilyashev & PartnersPJSC UkrsotsbankPJSC CB Nadra
23 A dispute on Delta Bank’s recovery of the credit debt from an individual in the London Court of International Arbitration 71 million АstapovLawyers, Moshe Kahn Advocates represented Delta Bank
24 Invalidation of decisions of the general meeting of Promtovarny Rynok LLC, charter, agreements on alienation of corporate rights 71 million Jurline represented LLC Viktor D
25 Recovery of debts in favor of VTB Bank from a corporate borrower - a major car company 66,7 million Sayenko Kharenko represented VTB Bank
26 The court proceedings under the claim of the State Mortgage Institution with respect to collection of debt from PJSC CB Nadra 66 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC CB Nadra
27 Recovery of debt from PJSC Renaissance and Production Vector LLC in favor of PJSC Alfa-Bank 65,5 million LCF Law Group represented PJSC Alfa-Bank
28 Recognition of property rights to the canning equipment and the water treatment plant owned by Femida-Inter LLC 65 million Ilyashev & Partners representedPJSC CB Nadra
29 Recovery of troubled debts in favor of PJSC Bank Forum (Commerzbank AG) from an oil trader 60,8 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC Bank Forum
30 The court proceedings under the claim of the Prosecutor's Office of the Odessa oblast concerning ownership of the shopping center Privoz 56 million Jurline representedthe shopping center Privoz LLC
31 A lawsuit under the claim of Construction Materials Plant No.1 LLC contesting sale and purchase agreement and claiming property from the debtors Kakhovka Market LLC, Barkhan LLC, ZSM No2 LLC 55 million LCF Law Group represented Construction Materials Plant No.1 LLC
32 Recovery of troubled debts in favor of UkrBorg LLC 54,3 million Asters represented UkrBorg LLC
33 A dispute of PJSC Alfa-Bank and PJSC Renaissance on foreclosure of the mortgaged property 54,3 million LCF Law Group represented PJSC Alfa-Bank
34 Recovery of troubled debts from Kakhovka Prom-Agro LLC in favor of PJSC CB Nadra 54 million Ilyashev & Partners representedPJSC CB Nadra
35 A dispute over the ownership of the shopping center Ukraina in Kiev 50 million Ilyashev & Partners represented investment company A1
36 Bankruptcy of JSC FSK Sea 50 million Ilyashev & Partners represented JSC FSK Sea
37 A dispute under the claim of ABC LLC against the National Commission on Securities and Stock Market concerning a failure to act 50 million EСOVIS Bondar & Bondar represented ABC LLC
38 A dispute under the claim of Factoring Company Elegant Invest LLC on recovery of debt 45 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC Ukraine Department Store
39 Bankruptcy of the troubled borrower of PJSC Bank of Cyprus - Overtime LLC 45 million LCF Law Group represented PJSC Bank of Cyprus
40 Bankruptcy of Mega Safe LLC 43 million Ilyashev & Partners representedMega Safe LLC
41 Recovery of debt in favor of VTB Bank from a corporate borrower 40,7 million Sayenko Kharenko represented VTB Bank
42 A dispute under the claim of PJSC CB Nadra seeking invalidation of a bank guarantee 40 million Ilyashev & Partners representedPJSC CB Nadra
43 Bankruptcy SERAGEM-UKRAINE LLC 40 million Nobili represented SERAGEM-UKRAINE LLC
44 A dispute between Medcom Marketing and Sales Ukraine LLC and the State Inspection for Price Control, appeal decisions and penalties 34 million* Sayenko Kharenko represented Medcom Marketing and Sales Ukraine LLC
45 Bankruptcy of the troubled borrower of PJSC ProCredit Bank – Interpharm LLC 33 million Ilyashev & Partners represented PJSC ProCredit Bank
46 A lawsuit under the claim of Arabic Energy Alliance UA LLC on recovery of gas 33 million LCF Law Group represented Arabic Energy Alliance UA LLC
47 A corporate dispute with participation of a group of construction companies BGM 32 million Sayenko Kharenko representedBGM
48 Seeking permission to enforce an award of the London Arbitration Court in Ukraine 28,2 million Grischenko & Partners represented Sea Emerald (Panama)
49 Recovery of an amount from the Department of Construction of the Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast Administration under an agreement on utilization of hazardous waste in favor of S.I.Grup Consort Ltd. 24,5 million LCF Law Group representedS.I.Grup Consort Ltd.
50 A dispute between the owners of NOVA Tech on splitting their assets 22 million Jurline, Yemets & Company represented natural persons – owners of NOVA Tech

Note Disputes in the table were closed during Q4 2013 – Q1-3 2014.
Disputes marked as confidential are not included into the table.
* — open sources